|
Around the
Campfire
Wild Earth
Magazine Ends
John Davis and I planned a new conservation
periodical in late 1990. The first issue of Wild Earth was
mailed in the spring of 1991. Now, the Wildlands Project board of
directors has decided that it is financially impossible to continue
publication. It is not known at this time whether or not the last
issue of Wild Earth (Winter 2004/2005) will even be mailed.
I am sure that shutting down Wild Earth was a heart-wrenching
decision. I am also convinced that the Wildlands Project board had
no choice but to do so.
The Rewilding Institute is exploring how this
website might be able to fill some of the void left with Wild
Earth’s passing. Your thoughts would be welcome.
An initial step to filling the void is that I
will continue my “Around the Campfire” column on The Rewilding
Institute website.
Around the Campfire,
Winter 2004
By Dave Foreman
Rewilding North America
(Note: This piece is taken from the “Introduction” to Dave
Foreman’s new book, Rewilding North America.)
From my earliest days, I have been drawn to the heart
of wildness, to wild lands and wild rivers and wild things, to the
places and beasts outside the rule of humankind. Long before I
learned the ancient English meaning of wilderness—“self-willed
land,” I looked up at the Sandia Mountains, rising above the city
of Albuquerque, and saw a world where we were not masters of all.
Long before I heard of the Beowulf-time word wildeor—“self-willed
beast,” I watched the horny-toads and bluetails scurry through the
grama grass and rabbitbrush of the high desert and knew that they
ran their errands on their own time in their own way, not on
human-time or in human-way.
As I grew older, I began to sense a loss
of what was no more, of once-upon-a-time wildernesses and
once-upon-a-time wild animals, as I read Ernest Thompson Seton and
Mark Twain, as I read about Kit Carson and Buffalo Bill. Unlike
many other boys, I did not yearn for the smoking buffalo gun in my
hands, but for the buffalo vast as summer cloud-shadows across the
land.
Older still, I watched the high desert
between Albuquerque and the Sandias gradually disappear under a
carpet of asphalt and buildings. As a young man, I saw raw roads
ripped into the wilderness, forests buzz-cut, rivers dammed, coal
torn from the badlands—all where I sought will of the land. And I
knew that if my wilderness—no, not mine, but its own—was to endure
I had to fight for it.
Aldo Leopold called the essays in A Sand
County Almanac “the delights and dilemmas of one who cannot” “live
without wild things.” Rewilding North America is no Sand County
Almanac, but it is the horror and the hope of another who cannot
live without wild things.
Doug Scott, a peerless strategist and campaign leader
for the wilderness movement for over thirty years, begins his
inspiring and authoritative A Wilderness-Forever Future: A Short
History of the National Wilderness Preservation System with a
vision:
Here is an American wilderness vision: the vision of “a
wilderness-forever future.” This is not my phrase, it is Howard
Zahniser's. And it is not my vision, but the one I inherited, and
that you, too, have inherited, from the wilderness leaders who
went before.
Scott quotes Zahniser, “The wilderness that has come to
us from the eternity of the past we have the boldness to project
into the eternity of the future.” The 1964 Wilderness Act, largely
written by Zahniser, embodies this vision in Section 2:
In order to assure that an increasing population, accompanied
by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy
and modify all areas within the United States and its possessions,
leaving no lands designated for preservation and protection in
their natural condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy of
the Congress to secure for the American people of present and
future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of
wilderness.
As settlement and mechanization yet grind
away at wildlands forty years after the passage of the Wilderness
Act, the challenge for conservationists in the twenty-first
century still is to protect an enduring resource of wilderness.
But before we can boldly project wilderness from the eternity of
the past into the eternity of the future, we must understand what
an enduring wilderness is. What are its characteristics? What must
be done to ensure that wilderness is enduring?
Since the Wilderness Act became law in
1964, our knowledge of what makes wilderness enduring has grown,
as has our knowledge of what destroys the eternity of wilderness.
And, thus, the task of Wilderness Areas and other protected areas
has evolved. This deepened understanding comes from the ecological
research and theory that, after 1978, became known as conservation
biology.
Of all ecology has learned since 1964,
the most important lesson is that Earth is now clearly in a mass
extinction event—the Sixth Great Extinction in the last five
hundred million years. Although this mass extinction began forty
thousand years ago when behaviorally modern humans spread out from
Africa, it has reached catastrophic proportions at the beginning
of the twenty-first century. Unlike previous mass extinctions,
which were caused by physical forces (asteroid strikes and
geological events), this Sixth Extinction is caused wholly by the
activities of Homo sapiens. Biologists widely recognize that
direct killing by humans, habitat destruction and fragmentation,
disease, pollution, and invasion and competition by alien species
are the general causes of current extinctions. Stemming this
alarming tide of extinction demands conservation vision and action
at local, regional, continental, and global scales.
Both the traditional conservation
movement and the recent science of conservation biology have
recognized that protected areas are the best way to safeguard
species and habitat. In 1980, conservation biology pioneers
Michael Soulé and Bruce Wilcox wrote that protected areas were
“the most valuable weapon in our conservation arsenal.” Protected
areas, such as National Parks, Wilderness Areas, and National
Wildlife Refuges, have been cornerstones for conservation strategy
in the United States, as have comparable areas throughout North
America and the world for more than one hundred years. Although
the goals of protected areas have included the preservation of an
enduring resource of wilderness and of self-regulating ecosystems,
we now understand that protected areas systems in North America
have not fully safeguarded all species and ecosystems, because of:
• Direct killing of native species, especially highly interactive
species, inside and outside of protected areas
• Poor ecosystem representation in protected areas, and degraded
ecosystems both within and outside protected areas
• Isolation of protected areas and fragmentation of habitat
between protected areas
• Loss or degradation of ecological processes, especially fire,
hydrology, and predation
• Invasion by disruptive exotic species and diseases
• Pollution
• Global climate change
Drawing on Aldo Leopold’s words, I call
these causes of extinctions wounds.
It is important to understand that national parks, wilderness
areas, and wildlife refuges have done much to protect and restore
nature. Without existing protected areas systems in North America
and the rest of the world, the state of nature would be far
bleaker. The problem is that not enough land has been protected,
and political and economic forces have thwarted and weakened the
establishment of protected areas. And, let's face it, science has
only recently understood the depth of ecological problems and even
more recently given guidelines for how to solve them.
To make protected areas more effective,
conservationists must now (1) work on very large landscapes,
probably continental in scope, and (2) undertake ecological
restoration based on rewilding. Instead of the island-like
protected areas currently in place, we need a continental
wildlands network of core wild areas, wildlife movement linkages,
and compatible-use lands to meet the habitat needs of wide-ranging
species, maintain natural disturbance regimes, and permit
dispersal and reestablishment of wildlife following natural events
such as fires. Moreover, this network must be based on the
scientific approach of rewilding, which recognizes the essential
role of top-down regulation of ecosystems by large carnivores, and
the need that large carnivores have for secure core habitats,
largely roadless, and for landscape permeability (habitat
connectivity) between core areas. Fully protected cores such as
wilderness areas are at the heart of this strategy. The Wildlands
Project summarizes this approach in its slogan, “Reconnect,
Restore, Rewild.”
Although such a continental vision is
bold and visionary, it follows in the footsteps of other
conservation visionaries. In the 1920s and 1930s, eminent
ecologist Victor Shelford and the Ecological Society of America
called for a careful inventory and planning for a United States
system of natural areas protecting all ecosystem types. Wilderness
Society founder Benton MacKaye based his vision for the
Appalachian Trail on regional planning. In developing the
Wilderness Act, Howard Zahniser planned for a national system of
wilderness areas cutting across agency boundaries. The peerless
system of national parks, national wildlife refuges, national wild
and scenic rivers, and wilderness areas in Alaska came from years
of careful planning by government professionals, scientists, and
citizens to protect entire ecosystems and represent all habitats
in Alaska. More recently, conservation groups have undertaken
huge, detailed, statewide inventories of potential wilderness
areas in western states.
Much conservation work is urgent,
responding to immediate threats to wildlands and wildlife, and
opportunistic, taking advantage of new political alignments and
such to protect certain areas. However, this work needs to be
based on an overarching vision and careful long-term planning to
be most effective. For example, Reed Noss proposed a conservation
area network for the state of Florida in the mid-1980s. Florida
state agencies and The Nature Conservancy then carried out
detailed planning to refine the network. With this solid,
scientifically defensible vision in place, the Florida state
legislature was convinced to appropriate $3.2 billion to buy
wildlife habitat. Without vision and careful planning, this would
not have happened. Similarly, the 2000 release of the Sky Islands
Wildlands Network Conservation Plan in southeastern Arizona and
southwestern New Mexico by the Wildlands Project, Sky Island
Alliance, Naturalia, and other groups has led to conservation
groups, outdoor recreationists, landowners, ranchers, and federal,
state, and county agencies working together to protect and restore
biological diversity across the region. Without the kind of
detailed citizen conservation work that has pulled together
wilderness area proposals since the 1960s, the current
106-million-acre National Wilderness Preservation System would be
far smaller and less ecologically representative.
In Rewilding North America, I propose
both a vision and a strategy to reconnect, restore, and rewild
Four Continental MegaLinkages that will tie North American
ecosystems together for wide-ranging species and ecological
processes, and to accommodate climate change. These MegaLinkages
are (1) the Pacific MegaLinkage, extending from Baja California to
Alaska; (2) the Spine of the Continent MegaLinkage, extending from
Central America to Alaska through the Rocky Mountains and other
ranges; (3) the Atlantic MegaLinkage, extending from Florida north
through the Appalachian Mountains to New Brunswick; and (4) the
Arctic-Boreal MegaLinkage, extending from Alaska across Canada to
the Canadian Maritime Provinces on the Atlantic coast. They are
the basic architecture for a bold, scientifically credible,
practically achievable, and hopeful vision of an enduring
wilderness for North America—a vision that embodies the primary
message of Rewilding North America.
--Dave Foreman, Sandia Foothills
(From Rewilding North
America by Dave Foreman. Copyright © 2004 by the
author. Reproduced by permission of Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Rewilding North America may be ordered from The Rewilding
Institute website. Footnotes in the book have been deleted here.)
News |
Contact Us |
Donate |
Resources |
Events |
Mission |
Vision
Meet the Fellows |
About TRI |