#37 Around the Campfire; “Piety, Prudence, Posterity”

By:

December 22, 2011

Perhaps the two topmost organizing dares before the wilderness and wildlife network today are to grow our web of friends among those who are politically middle-of-the-road or even slightly to the right, and among those in small towns and the hinterlands.  Too often we think the only field where we can gather new backers is the progressive/liberal one, but clubs such as Republicans for Environmental Protection, Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, and Trout Unlimited strongly show that there are more than a few folks caring about wild things who are not progressives, who may even be conservatives.

Desert Marigolds © Dave Foreman

Now, when I write conservative I do not mean so-called “movement conservatives,” shills for big business, or Tea Baggers, but the many folks who still have the values of “traditional conservatism,” which more or less lost its seat in the Republican Party in the Reagan years.  Indeed, some of the bedrock values for traditional conservatives, but not for today’s highly partisan right-wingers, are also bedrock values for wilderness and wildlife conservation—such as piety, prudence, and posterity.

I think that if we wildlovers would talk more about these values, we would find that we could better reach folks we are not reaching now because they think we are all left-wingers.

Dr. John Bliese, formerly Associate Professor of Communication Studies at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, has done more than anyone since the 1970s to show not only that conservatism and conservation can be like-minded, but also that the intellectual leaders of conservatism from the end of World War Two to the Reagan Revolution, most of all Russell Kirk, Richard M. Weaver, and Clinton Rossiter, were foes of landscalping. In 1953, Kirk wrote The Conservative Mind, likely the foremost conservative work of the last hundred years. In a 1996 article for Modern Age, Bliese writes, “If we go back to the ‘Founding Fathers’ of American traditionalist conservatism, we will find a solid philosophical basis that would lead conservatives to be environmentalists.” Conservatives and conservationists alike should read his book, The Greening Of Conservative America.  True conservatism has deep ties to conservation through the following thrusts: Antimaterialism, Piety, Prudence, Posterity, Values, and Responsibility.

I go into all these in my forthcoming book, Take Back Conservation, from which this “Campfire” but I’ll only write here about piety, prudence, and posterity.

Before we look at these principles, however, let’s go to writings by Russell Kirk on conservation and pollution.  Most of the work by Kirk (and Weaver) was before widespread heed was given to how we were wounding Earth.  Nonetheless, Kirk did not shun the land in his syndicated newspaper column in the 1960s and early 1970s.  In 1962, he wrote about pesticides and how they harmed wildlife.  He told his readers to read Rachel Carson’s newly released Silent Spring.  This is a big deal since Carson’s book led to a bitter wrangle among the directors of the Sierra Club, with some pooh-poohing any harm from pesticides. In your wildest dreams, can you see any leading conservative today telling folks to read a book like Silent Spring?

Bliese writes:

In 1965, [Kirk] deplored the fact that “rare, strange and beautiful animals are shrinking toward extinction in much of the world.”  He argued that “preservation of the multitudinous animal species has been enjoined by religion since the dawn of human consciousness,” with specific reference to the story of Noah.  He wrote this piece in South Africa’s Kruger National Park, but added that “we Americans have done our despicable share in decimating the animal kingdom.”

Please click on the attachment below to read the entire “Campfire.”

Spread Rewilding Around the Globe!

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below

Chad L - December 29, 2011

What a great post. The distinction between Conservatism and Movement Conservatism is really important and understanding it allows folks to see allies where they might not have and get a better view of the enemy.

Reply
Kevin Schmelzlen - January 11, 2012

As a conservative conservationist, I agree with many arguments made in this post, although I think you did the article an injustice by implying that “Tea Baggers” (a derogatory term for supporters of the Tea Party movement) could not be a part of the equation, and by using a term which would be viewed by potential “green” conservatives as negative and alienating. The Tea Party movement supports “traditional conservatism”, which I affiliate myself with, much more than it supports neo-conservatism (which I would argue does not mesh well with environmentalism). I consider myself a naturalist and environmentalist before I consider myself a conservative, but in my view, a traditional conservative ethic is essential towards long-term sustainability of our planet.
I just had to say my piece. Overall, very good article!

Reply
Gabriela - June 2, 2025

In 1970, Richard Nixon established the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and he adored his wife, Ms. Pat Nixon-even changing state dinner protocol so that she could be served first. Who knows how history of conservatism might have unfolded had Nixon taken the Roy Cohn route and deny, deny, deny when his administration was ill-advised (from my perspective) to resign. Another J. Edgar Hoover may have prevented the entire recording from ever entering the public domain, because certainly dirty tricks are not just another tax to pass “Go” in the world of politics.

I am of the mindset that once we establish some important markers that merit preservation and protection from a self-evident standpoint like the physical world that feeds our children, enabling our species to propagate, then we can begin to consider moving forward in whatever the rebels call “progress.” Instead, we put band aids like an EPA that further corrupts a fully-functioning system designed to exacerbate moral hazard and reward sociopathic regulatory capture (incidentally, the PFOAs infiltrating the world’s entire system began in the 1970s and ProPublica’s 2024 report has resulted in zero arrests unless I am missing something).

Once the human beings on this planet identify themselves as rational human beings, actions to “conserve” the environment will naturally entail obliterating these profit-driven anti-human being entities. One way to begin realigning proper incentives that elicits logical behavior is by doing away with taxes on non-owners or workers and taxing the common good or owners of common goods similar to the Land Value Tax as proposed by Henry George in his best-selling economic treatise: Progress & Poverty. Something, anything must be done to halt the madness and we are more than capable to really make strides if you read Genesis, understand that dominion means stewardship and cultivate strong leadership skills through piety and discernment.

Reply
Leave a Reply: